Date Joined: Mar 14, 2016 18:48:07 GMT -5
|
Post by Springschick on Aug 6, 2022 1:37:52 GMT -5
What is hypocritical? Please explain in detail, or do you need Maxx to do that, too? And you constantly saying you could not care less how I feel about you is belied by your constant insistence that you are not bothered. If you truly were not bothered, there would be no need to mention it over and over again. I don't think you are smart enough to get it. That is why I must keep repeating it. You are a hypocrite because you do something and then attack me for the exact same thing you did. It that clear enough? No, it's not. I asked you if you realized that it was a church pastor who wrote the article since your words stated a non-believer was preaching gospel. I read and understood the post. Did you?
|
|
Date Joined: May 29, 2020 20:23:50 GMT -5
|
Post by John on Aug 6, 2022 1:41:07 GMT -5
I went to the article and read it after Maxx posted it. I never heard of the minister, and I am making no judgments about him, but Maxx did not post it because he agrees with it. He thinks it helps get Christians to stop aggressively opposing him, so I made him an offer to show him the best kind of love, trying to preach at him till he is converted. I make that offer to any unbeliever that thinks I am not loving them as I should. Maxx made no comment on the article one way or another. Only you did, and you did it before you even knew what you were talking about. You did it right here. Springschick, the prognosticator and hypocrite. I came back and said Maxx posted the article to intimidate Christians into not attacking him, and you attacked me for that.
|
|
Date Joined: May 29, 2020 20:23:50 GMT -5
|
Post by John on Aug 6, 2022 1:41:41 GMT -5
I know why Maxx, an atheist posted it. You are just speculating. Do you? Did God share his omniscience with you? This was your comment to me.
|
|
Date Joined: May 29, 2020 20:23:50 GMT -5
|
Post by John on Aug 6, 2022 1:47:24 GMT -5
In reality, it makes no difference if you guessed right or wrong or if I did. You still accused me of something without proof of intent as I did Maxx. They were both educated guesses. For some reason, you keep feeling the need to rescue Maxx. It is a regular occurrence.
|
|
Date Joined: Mar 14, 2016 18:48:07 GMT -5
|
Post by Springschick on Aug 6, 2022 1:47:44 GMT -5
Maxx made no comment on the article one way or another. Only you did, and you did it before you even knew what you were talking about. You did it right here. Springschick, the prognosticator and hypocrite. I came back and said Maxx posted the article to intimidate Christians into not attacking him, and you attacked me for that. Is that how you interpreted that? What was wrong about it? Maxx did not make comment. Your comment on this was to state that a non-believer was preaching Gospel, which was untrue. So, either you commented without knowing what you were talking about, or your reading comprehension is abysmal.
|
|
Date Joined: Mar 14, 2016 18:48:07 GMT -5
|
Post by Springschick on Aug 6, 2022 1:49:01 GMT -5
Do you? Did God share his omniscience with you? This was your comment to me. Yes it was. You claim to know something I am only speculating on. I know you are not omniscient, so you must have borrowed it from someone.
|
|
Date Joined: Mar 14, 2016 18:48:07 GMT -5
|
Post by Springschick on Aug 6, 2022 1:50:03 GMT -5
In reality, it makes no difference if you guessed right or wrong or if I did. You still accused me of something without proof of intent as I did Maxx. They were both educated guesses. For some reason, you keep feeling the need to rescue Maxx. It is a regular occurrence. Rescuing him from what, exactly?
|
|
Date Joined: Mar 14, 2016 18:48:07 GMT -5
|
Post by Springschick on Aug 6, 2022 1:54:34 GMT -5
While you are at it, tell me how this is an educated guess "I get such a laugh watching unbelievers trying to preach a gospel they do not believe or understand."
|
|
Date Joined: May 29, 2020 20:23:50 GMT -5
|
Post by John on Aug 6, 2022 1:57:04 GMT -5
This was your comment to me. Yes it was. You claim to know something I am only speculating on. I know you are not omniscient, so you must have borrowed it from someone. You are making a judgment without proof. I did the same thing. We both had reasons to believe what we did, but it was the exact same thing. My reading comprehension is just fine. I have to wonder if you are so blind, you just can't see what a hypocrite you are. My comments to Maxx were based on motive. If he posted that story, it was not because he was a Christian. It was to manipulate Christians. I read the portion of the article he posted before commenting. I later read the rest of it. I knew Maxx was meaning it to show we must love everyone meaning not to be overly critical, so he was using it to preach a false gospel. I did see who wrote it, but left my comments as is because I knew the intent of Maxx. As such, nothing changed.
|
|
Date Joined: May 29, 2020 20:23:50 GMT -5
|
Post by John on Aug 6, 2022 1:57:51 GMT -5
While you are at it, tell me how this is an educated guess "I get such a laugh watching unbelievers trying to preach a gospel they do not believe or understand." Maxx is the unbeliever. He preached it when he posted it.
|
|
Date Joined: May 29, 2020 20:23:50 GMT -5
|
Post by John on Aug 6, 2022 1:58:39 GMT -5
I did not write the Bible, but when I post scripture, I am preaching.
|
|
Date Joined: Mar 14, 2016 18:48:07 GMT -5
|
Post by Springschick on Aug 6, 2022 2:03:30 GMT -5
I did not write the Bible, but when I post scripture, I am preaching. And you are the author of the thoughts and ideas you post if it is an original post. If it is a copy and paste of an op-ed piece published in numerous newspapers than those are the words of the author, not the person who reprinted it.
|
|
Date Joined: Mar 14, 2016 18:48:07 GMT -5
|
Post by Springschick on Aug 6, 2022 2:05:14 GMT -5
While you are at it, tell me how this is an educated guess "I get such a laugh watching unbelievers trying to preach a gospel they do not believe or understand." Maxx is the unbeliever. He preached it when he posted it. But those are not Maxx's words, are they? Maxx is not shy about posting his own opinions after an article he posts. He did nothing of the sort here, did he?
|
|
Date Joined: May 29, 2020 20:23:50 GMT -5
|
Post by John on Aug 6, 2022 2:10:37 GMT -5
Maxx is the unbeliever. He preached it when he posted it. But those are not Maxx's words, are they? Maxx is not shy about posting his own opinions after an article he posts. He did nothing of the sort here, did he? Maxx had an ulterior motive. I told you what I believe it was. When Les posts "Our Daily Bread," he is spreading the gospel, though it is not his words. Maxx was using someone else's words to preach at us. Many of us use quotes to do that. Maxx was the unbeliever preaching at us.
|
|
Date Joined: Mar 14, 2016 18:48:07 GMT -5
|
Post by Springschick on Aug 6, 2022 2:25:02 GMT -5
But those are not Maxx's words, are they? Maxx is not shy about posting his own opinions after an article he posts. He did nothing of the sort here, did he? Maxx had an ulterior motive. I told you what I believe it was. When Les posts "Our Daily Bread," he is spreading the gospel, though it is not his words. Maxx was using someone else's words to preach at us. Many of us use quotes to do that. Maxx was the unbeliever preaching at us. So, Maxx "preaches" the words of a renowned preacher, and you laugh at those words, not because of what they say, but because of what you think are ulterior motives to get Christians to stop attacking him? So, you will take all of the credence out of the pastors words because you feel put upon? You are now saying that a post's content is irrelevant? Or are you so blinded by your "love" of Maxx that all you see is the source and ignore the content?
|
|
Date Joined: May 29, 2020 20:23:50 GMT -5
|
Post by John on Aug 6, 2022 2:33:21 GMT -5
Maxx had an ulterior motive. I told you what I believe it was. When Les posts "Our Daily Bread," he is spreading the gospel, though it is not his words. Maxx was using someone else's words to preach at us. Many of us use quotes to do that. Maxx was the unbeliever preaching at us. So, Maxx "preaches" the words of a renowned preacher, and you laugh at those words, not because of what they say, but because of what you think are ulterior motives to get Christians to stop attacking him? So, you will take all of the credence our of the pastors words because you feel put upon? You are now saying that a post's content is irrelevant? Or are you so blinded by your "love" of Maxx that all you see is the source and ignore the content? From the way you defend him, it seems like you are in love with Maxx. The message itself was okay, as best I could tell. I was judging Maxx's motives for posting it. I am pretty sure I understand why he did it. That is what I was mocking. Maxx is as much a preacher as I am or that man was, but he preaches for the devil and his kingdom while I am on God's side. For instance, that other post he had about abortion was him preaching. He used the video and added his own comments in an additional post. That is his lane as a servant of Satan, but in this case, he was misusing a Christian minister's words to deceive Christians. The minister was not saying what Max thought he was.
|
|
Date Joined: May 29, 2020 20:23:50 GMT -5
|
Post by John on Aug 6, 2022 2:36:23 GMT -5
Maxx preaches the devil's doctrine all the time. That thread he had about all the man-made religions was not his words, but he was preaching. It was to deceive. It was to persuade. It is the same thing we do, but for his science god which is really the devil.
|
|
Date Joined: Mar 14, 2016 18:48:07 GMT -5
|
Post by Springschick on Aug 6, 2022 2:40:23 GMT -5
So, Maxx "preaches" the words of a renowned preacher, and you laugh at those words, not because of what they say, but because of what you think are ulterior motives to get Christians to stop attacking him? So, you will take all of the credence our of the pastors words because you feel put upon? You are now saying that a post's content is irrelevant? Or are you so blinded by your "love" of Maxx that all you see is the source and ignore the content? From the way you defend him, it seems like you are in love with Maxx. The message itself was okay, as best I could tell. I was judging Maxx's motives for posting it. I am pretty sure I understand why he did it. That is what I was mocking. Maxx is as much a preacher as I am or that man was, but he preaches for the devil and his kingdom while I am on God's side. For instance, that other post he had about abortion was him preaching. He used the video and added his own comments in an additional post. That is his lane as a servant of Satan, but in this case, he was misusing a Christian minister's words to deceive Christians. The minister was not saying what Max thought he was. Defending Maxx from what? Maxx was a vehicle here for your vitriol. And what do you mean that the message was okay best as you could tell? Didn't you say you read it? It was not a confusing op-ed piece. What part are you unsure of?
|
|
Date Joined: Mar 14, 2016 18:48:07 GMT -5
|
Post by Springschick on Aug 6, 2022 2:43:06 GMT -5
Maxx preaches the devil's doctrine all the time. That thread he had about all the man-made religions was not his words, but he was preaching. It was to deceive. It was to persuade. It is the same thing we do, but for his science god which is really the devil. How can he be preaching for his "science god" when you say he is an atheist, meaning without any god?
|
|
Date Joined: May 29, 2020 20:23:50 GMT -5
|
Post by John on Aug 6, 2022 2:43:52 GMT -5
What I mean about the message being okay as best I can tell is that I didn't analyze it for every possible doctrinal error. I read it quickly. What do you care anyway? Is he your preacher? In case you didn't know it, Christians do not agree on all points of doctrine, which is why there are so many churches.
|
|