|
Date Joined: May 17, 2024 11:33:42 GMT -5
|
Post by Dr. JMA23 on Jul 10, 2024 13:13:41 GMT -5
If crust temperature rises as depth increases, up to 3500C, and global warming is like a heat lamp on the surface, how does it have less energy present without running afoul of the second law of thermodynamics ? how does what have less energy present? Your cool cave. Cold, cool doesn't exist, it's just a concept of comfort. In reality there is only more or less energy present. |
|
|
Date Joined: Jun 30, 2024 20:19:58 GMT -5
|
Post by naz on Jul 10, 2024 13:31:41 GMT -5
how does what have less energy present? Your cool cave. Cold, cool doesn't exist, it's just a concept of comfort. In reality there is only more or less energy present. I believe I already explained that. If you need more info consult a physicist. |
|
|
Date Joined: May 17, 2024 11:33:42 GMT -5
|
Post by Dr. JMA23 on Jul 10, 2024 13:46:35 GMT -5
Your cool cave. Cold, cool doesn't exist, it's just a concept of comfort. In reality there is only more or less energy present. I believe I already explained that. If you need more info consult a physicist. You have explained nothing, and I wasn't asking for your help. I have had a Doctorate in Physics since the early 1980's I was just seeing what you know in regards to the physics of energy transfer, which was my specialty in the field. Your 'cool cave' reasoning and how you first applied it, was a bit humorous. I'll just leave it at that. |
|
|
Date Joined: Jun 30, 2024 20:19:58 GMT -5
|
Post by naz on Jul 10, 2024 13:54:12 GMT -5
I believe I already explained that. If you need more info consult a physicist. You have explained nothing, and I wasn't asking for your help. I have had a Doctorate in Physics since the early 1980's I was just seeing what you know in regards to the physics of energy transfer, which was my specialty in the field. Your 'cool cave' reasoning and how you first applied it, was a bit humorous. I'll just leave it at that. Well then by all means set me straight (I doubt you can or will) |
|
|
Date Joined: May 17, 2024 11:33:42 GMT -5
|
Post by Dr. JMA23 on Jul 10, 2024 13:59:11 GMT -5
You have explained nothing, and I wasn't asking for your help. I have had a Doctorate in Physics since the early 1980's I was just seeing what you know in regards to the physics of energy transfer, which was my specialty in the field. Your 'cool cave' reasoning and how you first applied it, was a bit humorous. I'll just leave it at that. Well then by all means set me straight (I doubt you can or will) Your doubts lack the background education, which you made obvious by your suggestion. Carry on. |
|
|
Date Joined: Jun 30, 2024 20:19:58 GMT -5
|
Post by naz on Jul 10, 2024 14:04:32 GMT -5
Dr. JMA23 , I don't even believe your bs claim you have a physics degree. If you do you must have bought it.
|
|
|
Date Joined: Jun 30, 2024 20:19:58 GMT -5
|
Post by naz on Jul 10, 2024 14:07:55 GMT -5
Well then by all means set me straight (I doubt you can or will) Your doubts lack the background education, which you made obvious by your suggestion. Carry on. Yep I knew you would not respond. All you do here is bullshit and pretend you are smarter than everyone else. |
|
|
Date Joined: May 17, 2024 11:33:42 GMT -5
|
Post by Dr. JMA23 on Jul 10, 2024 14:09:25 GMT -5
Dr. JMA23 , I don't even believe your bs claim you have a physics degree. If you do you must have bought it. Gee, naz delivering personal insults. So surprising, lol. I see you finally found your answer. Now you need to work on that memory, we've had this discussion before. |
|
|
Date Joined: May 17, 2024 11:33:42 GMT -5
|
Post by Dr. JMA23 on Jul 10, 2024 14:10:09 GMT -5
Your doubts lack the background education, which you made obvious by your suggestion. Carry on. Yep I knew you would not respond. All you do here is bullshit and pretend you are smarter than everyone else. Says the person without the background education.  Uh, respond to what ? |
|
|
Date Joined: Jun 30, 2024 20:19:58 GMT -5
|
Post by naz on Jul 10, 2024 14:15:10 GMT -5
Dr. JMA23 , I don't even believe your bs claim you have a physics degree. If you do you must have bought it. Gee, naz delivering personal insults. So surprising, lol. I see you finally found your answer. Now you need to work on that memory, we've had this discussion before. Oh, so now that you were exposed you now agree my original answer was correct. Awesome. Here's more... Despite its geological significance, Earth's interior heat contributes only 0.03% of Earth's total energy budget at the surface, which is dominated by 173,000 TW of incoming solar radiation. This external energy source powers most of the planet's atmospheric, oceanic, and biologic processes. Nevertheless on land and at the ocean floor, the sensible heat absorbed from non-reflected insolation flows inward only by means of thermal conduction, and thus penetrates only a few dozen centimeters on the daily cycle and only a few dozen meters on the annual cycle. This renders solar radiation minimally relevant for processes internal to Earth's crust |
|
|
Date Joined: Jun 30, 2024 20:19:58 GMT -5
|
Post by naz on Jul 10, 2024 14:16:10 GMT -5
Yep I knew you would not respond. All you do here is bullshit and pretend you are smarter than everyone else. Says the person without the background education. Uh, respond to what ? You know damn well. |
|
|
Date Joined: May 17, 2024 11:33:42 GMT -5
|
Post by Dr. JMA23 on Jul 10, 2024 14:18:21 GMT -5
Says the person without the background education. Uh, respond to what ? You know damn well. Somebody seems a little unhappy. |
|
|
Date Joined: May 17, 2024 11:33:42 GMT -5
|
Post by Dr. JMA23 on Jul 10, 2024 14:19:42 GMT -5
Gee, naz delivering personal insults. So surprising, lol. I see you finally found your answer. Now you need to work on that memory, we've had this discussion before. Oh, so now that you were exposed you now agree my original answer was correct. Awesome. Here's more... Despite its geological significance, Earth's interior heat contributes only 0.03% of Earth's total energy budget at the surface, which is dominated by 173,000 TW of incoming solar radiation. This external energy source powers most of the planet's atmospheric, oceanic, and biologic processes. Nevertheless on land and at the ocean floor, the sensible heat absorbed from non-reflected insolation flows inward only by means of thermal conduction, and thus penetrates only a few dozen centimeters on the daily cycle and only a few dozen meters on the annual cycle. This renders solar radiation minimally relevant for processes internal to Earth's crust Uh, these don't look like 'your' answers. Looks like something a google scholar comes up with. |
|
|
Date Joined: Jun 30, 2024 20:19:58 GMT -5
|
Post by naz on Jul 10, 2024 14:20:17 GMT -5
Somebody seems a little unhappy. Yeah, your kind of bullshit pisses me off. And still you have nothing to challenge what I said. No surprise there as you never do. |
|
|
Date Joined: May 17, 2024 11:33:42 GMT -5
|
Post by Dr. JMA23 on Jul 10, 2024 14:21:08 GMT -5
Somebody seems a little unhappy. Yeah, your kind of bullshit pisses me off. And still you have nothing to challenge what I said. No surprise there as you never do. There's no challenges in physics. Are you that uneducated ? |
|
|
Date Joined: Jun 30, 2024 20:19:58 GMT -5
|
Post by naz on Jul 10, 2024 14:21:21 GMT -5
Oh, so now that you were exposed you now agree my original answer was correct. Awesome. Here's more... Despite its geological significance, Earth's interior heat contributes only 0.03% of Earth's total energy budget at the surface, which is dominated by 173,000 TW of incoming solar radiation. This external energy source powers most of the planet's atmospheric, oceanic, and biologic processes. Nevertheless on land and at the ocean floor, the sensible heat absorbed from non-reflected insolation flows inward only by means of thermal conduction, and thus penetrates only a few dozen centimeters on the daily cycle and only a few dozen meters on the annual cycle. This renders solar radiation minimally relevant for processes internal to Earth's crust Uh, these don't look like 'your' answers. Looks like something a google scholar comes up with. Wikipedia backs up what I said. Where is your "scientific" rebuttal. Still waiting... |
|
|
Date Joined: Jun 30, 2024 20:19:58 GMT -5
|
Post by naz on Jul 10, 2024 14:22:23 GMT -5
Yeah, your kind of bullshit pisses me off. And still you have nothing to challenge what I said. No surprise there as you never do. There's no challenges in physics. Are you that uneducated ? challenged my response saying it was silly. Back up or shut up! Of course we both know you can't. |
|
|
Date Joined: May 17, 2024 11:33:42 GMT -5
|
Post by Dr. JMA23 on Jul 10, 2024 14:22:46 GMT -5
Uh, these don't look like 'your' answers. Looks like something a google scholar comes up with. Wikipedia backs up what I said. Where is your "scientific" rebuttal. Still waiting... The fact you would think there is a rebuttal to the basics of physics makes me smile a bit. |
|
|
Date Joined: May 17, 2024 11:33:42 GMT -5
|
Post by Dr. JMA23 on Jul 10, 2024 14:23:34 GMT -5
There's no challenges in physics. Are you that uneducated ? challenged my response saying it was silly. Back up or shut up! Of course we both know you can't. Your response was silly in its original presentation. I think it was the relation of crust temps and cavern logic all twisted up. |
|
|
Date Joined: Jun 30, 2024 20:19:58 GMT -5
|
Post by naz on Jul 10, 2024 14:24:55 GMT -5
Wikipedia backs up what I said. Where is your "scientific" rebuttal. Still waiting... The fact you would think there is a rebuttal to the basics of physics makes me smile a bit. Keep going. Your obvious inability to back up your contentions is quite hilarious |
|
