|
Date Joined: Oct 11, 2011 19:28:34 GMT -5
|
Post by romaniprincess on Sept 7, 2021 17:38:38 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Date Joined: May 12, 2024 23:48:29 GMT -5
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2021 20:23:16 GMT -5
Yet another example of how the lies, paranoia and hysteria of the green mob is refuted by the facts. There is NOTHING we can do about solar activity! So we should worrying about the environment because hey, Mother Nature's gonna one day screw us over anyway.... That's nice. |
|
|
Date Joined: Oct 11, 2011 19:28:34 GMT -5
|
Post by romaniprincess on Sept 8, 2021 18:01:30 GMT -5
Not what I said. Of course we should take care of the environment (which is more than the poseurs of Stinking Pseudo-Rebellion do) but that's a logn way from saying that human activity controls climate change.
The sun and moon are both beyond our control and they're the bosses in terms of climate change!
|
|
|
Date Joined: Sept 16, 2012 13:59:47 GMT -5
|
Post by sauerkraut on Sept 23, 2021 9:34:23 GMT -5
The sun is the biggest and really only driver of our weather, without the sun we'd be at absolute zero- a frozen ball.
The sun has solar cycles and sun spot cycles warmer periods and cooler periods and if the sun is burning hotter or colder it affects all of the planets.
I dunno, I never heard people who talk of global warming or "climate change" bring up the sun or solar output.
I have heard it said that computer models for global warming leave out of the equitation solar activity and focus only on man & fossil fuels and of course the mighty SUV. In fact I have not seen Al Gores 2006 film about global warming, but I don't think Al Gore mentions anything about the sun or solar output in his film.
How often have ya heard people who talk of global warming/climate change bring up the sun? It's always fossil fuels and man.
That passes as real science, that's the consensus ~~ when in reality there is no such thing as a "consensus" in real science. Real science follows the facts where ever they may lead.
|
|
