|
Date Joined: Oct 11, 2011 19:28:34 GMT -5
|
Post by romaniprincess on Apr 10, 2023 16:22:25 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Date Joined: May 12, 2024 10:03:50 GMT -5
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2023 18:20:59 GMT -5
Greenhouse gases only serve as detours, not permanent traps. Those detours simply delay the time needed for heat to escape to space. Not understanding this crucial point, has led to many absurd theories of a climate crisis, mass extinctions and much weeping and gnashing of teeth.
link
Coupled with the fact that all CO2 in our atmosphere is at 100% energy saturation, the transfer happens at speed of light.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Date Joined: May 12, 2024 10:03:50 GMT -5
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2023 9:04:25 GMT -5
AMO physicists William van Wijngaarden and William Happer have recently completed an extremely detailed study of radiation absorption by the principal “greenhouse” gases including water vapor (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), ozone (O3), nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4). Their paper has been released as a preprint entitled “Dependence of Earth’s Thermal Radiation on Five Most Abundant Greenhouse Gases”. Their research regarding CO2 determined that the wavelengths at which CO2 absorbs radiation from the surface of the globe are essentially “saturated”, meaning that the current concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere is sufficient to absorb virtually all the radiation emitted at the wavelengths in which CO2 absorbs.
This is an extremely important conclusion, since it indicates that emission of additional CO2 into the atmosphere will have little or no effect on global temperatures, confirming the logarithmic relationship shown in the graph above, but based on far more detailed research. The conclusion confirms that there is no climate “crisis” now and that there would be no climate crisis in the future, regardless of the quantity of additional anthropogenic CO2 emissions. link
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Date Joined: May 12, 2024 10:03:50 GMT -5
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2023 9:09:45 GMT -5
In simpler terms.
All the wavelength energy that is available from the sun that CO2 absorbs, is already being absorbed (100% saturation), so providing a bigger bucket with holes in it that never let it overflow, under the energy spigot running at a set speed, doesn't create more energy from the sun for the bucket to hold. The bigger bucket transfers the same total energy absorbed back to space on the dark side, while being less full.
|
|
|
Date Joined: Sept 16, 2012 13:59:47 GMT -5
|
Post by sauerkraut on Apr 12, 2023 12:22:16 GMT -5
The bottom line is this is all political and it's for an agenda, real science is ignored or kicked aside. No matter what facts say or what real experts say, they will carry on with this global warming hoax agenda and it's also making many people very rich.
Since he left being the V.P. Al Gore became richer than ever with his global warming agenda. As they say follow the money and you'll see the real reason behind global warming.
|
|
|
Date Joined: May 20, 2022 16:28:37 GMT -5
|
Post by apple on Apr 12, 2023 12:26:59 GMT -5
The bottom line is this is all political and it's for an agenda, real science is ignored or kicked aside. No matter what facts say or what real experts say, they will carry on with this global warming hoax agenda and it's also making many people very rich. Since he left being the V.P. Al Gore became richer than ever with his global warming agenda. As they say follow the money and you'll see the real reason behind global warming. Political polarization ...the growing gap of political attitudes and identities among the public that undermine the pursuit of a common good. Its emergence is often compounded by the rise of ideologically divided masses and radical political parties. An issue can be real and legitimate but not convenient for a political party. Usually you just have to follow the money. |
|
|
Date Joined: Apr 5, 2018 3:27:17 GMT -5
|
Post by sb on Apr 12, 2023 13:52:17 GMT -5
Usually you just have to follow the money. Yes. Who pays for the studies, the committees, the organizations that conform to the global warming paradigm and ultimately who benefits by the proposed solutions? |
|
|
Date Joined: May 20, 2022 16:28:37 GMT -5
|
Post by apple on Apr 13, 2023 8:38:05 GMT -5
Usually you just have to follow the money. Yes. Who pays for the studies, the committees, the organizations that conform to the global warming paradigm and ultimately who benefits by the proposed solutions? Not big oil. |
|
|
Date Joined: Apr 5, 2018 3:27:17 GMT -5
|
Post by sb on Apr 13, 2023 9:05:43 GMT -5
Yes. Who pays for the studies, the committees, the organizations that conform to the global warming paradigm and ultimately who benefits by the proposed solutions? Not big oil. Do you not know? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Date Joined: May 12, 2024 10:03:50 GMT -5
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2023 9:13:50 GMT -5
Yes. Who pays for the studies, the committees, the organizations that conform to the global warming paradigm and ultimately who benefits by the proposed solutions? Not big oil. Big Electric ? |
|
|
Date Joined: Sept 16, 2012 13:59:47 GMT -5
|
Post by sauerkraut on Apr 14, 2023 9:45:29 GMT -5
Reminds me of that game show "The Weakest Link"
|
|
|
Date Joined: Sept 16, 2012 13:59:47 GMT -5
|
Post by sauerkraut on Apr 18, 2023 11:47:58 GMT -5
They want America to become an all electric country from electric stoves to electric cars, even electric army tanks for battle.
|
|
