Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Date Joined: May 19, 2024 10:14:48 GMT -5
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2023 13:06:44 GMT -5
Looks like he clearly lifts his leg very high intentionally to me. He twists and lifts his leg like he's doing a karate move.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Date Joined: May 19, 2024 10:14:48 GMT -5
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2023 13:12:17 GMT -5
Why isn't there some type of neck wound medical protocol? Seems if someone has a gash on their neck. there should be immediate attention, someone should rush over and apply hard pressure to the site and get them in ambulance. The man stood up and literally bled out all over the ice. This isn't the first time someone sustained a neck wound from a blade
|
|
Date Joined: May 20, 2022 16:28:37 GMT -5
|
Post by apple on Oct 31, 2023 13:16:54 GMT -5
Why isn't there some type of neck wound medical protocol? Seems if someone has a gash on their neck. there should be immediate attention, someone should rush over and apply hard pressure to the site and get them in ambulance. The man stood up and literally bled out all over the ice. This isn't the first time someone sustained a neck wound from a blade My boys wear a neck guard. Neck guards are a mandatory piece of equipment in most organized hockey leagues, not the National Hockey League (NHL) and international play.
|
|
Date Joined: Mar 14, 2016 18:48:07 GMT -5
|
Post by Springschick on Oct 31, 2023 14:21:17 GMT -5
Have the conspiracy theorists uncovered some deep, dark motive for this murderous attack, which was carried out with amazing timing and precision?
**sarcasm**
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Date Joined: May 19, 2024 10:14:48 GMT -5
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2023 14:39:28 GMT -5
Have the conspiracy theorists uncovered some deep, dark motive for this murderous attack, which was carried out with amazing timing and precision? **sarcasm** I think it's reasonable and right to see if it was an intentional or flagrant attempt or not. Why call any penalties in a game? Just assume nobody is ever doing something outside of the rules then? A man died in a horrific way. And it should be investigated to see what happened and why. And if they deem it an accident, then so be it. But, one should absolutely be looking and studying the circumstances when this man died on the ice. Guess I am not seeing a need for sarcasm to have a discussion about it.
|
|
Date Joined: Mar 14, 2016 18:48:07 GMT -5
|
Post by Springschick on Oct 31, 2023 15:00:12 GMT -5
Have the conspiracy theorists uncovered some deep, dark motive for this murderous attack, which was carried out with amazing timing and precision? **sarcasm** I think it's reasonable and right to see if it was an intentional or flagrant attempt or not. Why call any penalties in a game? Just assume nobody is ever doing something outside of the rules then? A man died in a horrific way. And it should be investigated to see what happened and why. And if they deem it an accident, then so be it. But, one should absolutely be looking and studying the circumstances when this man died on the ice. Guess I am not seeing a need for sarcasm to have a discussion about it. It is being investigated, by the people who know what to look for. The rest of your statement about penalties and such is just silly. But I am sure you know that. And if not, perhaps you should investigate why you read into things not there or implied and jump to ridiculous all or nothing conclusions.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Date Joined: May 19, 2024 10:14:48 GMT -5
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2023 15:05:12 GMT -5
I think it's reasonable and right to see if it was an intentional or flagrant attempt or not. Why call any penalties in a game? Just assume nobody is ever doing something outside of the rules then? A man died in a horrific way. And it should be investigated to see what happened and why. And if they deem it an accident, then so be it. But, one should absolutely be looking and studying the circumstances when this man died on the ice. Guess I am not seeing a need for sarcasm to have a discussion about it. It is being investigated, by the people who know what to look for. The rest of your statement about penalties and such is just silly. But I am sure you know that. And if not, perhaps you should investigate why you read into things not there or implied and jump to ridiculous all or nothing conclusions. There is nothing silly about my statements or opinions. There are things that happen in games that are viewed as flagrant or intentional. Saying something is an intentional foul isn't saying that someone was trying to murder someone. But it is saying they are going beyond the rules of the game. So, not sure of your need to be so defensive. And there are other hockey players who think that was a questionable move. Are they being "silly"? You know better than them?
|
|
Date Joined: Mar 14, 2016 18:48:07 GMT -5
|
Post by Springschick on Oct 31, 2023 15:13:18 GMT -5
It is being investigated, by the people who know what to look for. The rest of your statement about penalties and such is just silly. But I am sure you know that. And if not, perhaps you should investigate why you read into things not there or implied and jump to ridiculous all or nothing conclusions. There is nothing silly about my statements or opinions. There are things that happen in games that are viewed as flagrant or intentional. Saying something is an intentional foul isn't saying that someone was trying to murder someone. But it is saying they are going beyond the rules of the game. So, not sure of your need to be so defensive. I didn't see the need for you to ask why any penalties should ever be called, yada yada yada. Nobody even suggested anything remotely close to that. And since you posted that nonsense to me, it indicates that I somehow insinuated it. I did not, so why did you even say anything about that?
|
|
Date Joined: Mar 14, 2016 18:48:07 GMT -5
|
Post by Springschick on Oct 31, 2023 15:15:08 GMT -5
And refer back to the title of this thread and the opening post, and you will see why there is sarcasm.
|
|
Date Joined: May 20, 2022 16:28:37 GMT -5
|
Post by apple on Oct 31, 2023 15:34:24 GMT -5
It is being investigated, by the people who know what to look for. The rest of your statement about penalties and such is just silly. But I am sure you know that. And if not, perhaps you should investigate why you read into things not there or implied and jump to ridiculous all or nothing conclusions. There is nothing silly about my statements or opinions. There are things that happen in games that are viewed as flagrant or intentional. Saying something is an intentional foul isn't saying that someone was trying to murder someone. But it is saying they are going beyond the rules of the game. So, not sure of your need to be so defensive. And there are other hockey players who think that was a questionable move. Are they being "silly"? You know better than them? Yes, the rules should state, DO NOT ACCIDENTALLY KILL OTHER PLAYERS. There, problem solved.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Date Joined: May 19, 2024 10:14:48 GMT -5
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2023 15:46:58 GMT -5
People can accidently kills others and still be held liable for that. There are charges such manslaughter, negligent homicide etc. A sharpened ice skate is obviously a very dangerous thing to lunge at someone with. His leg clearly lifts up well past his hip. That's not a hockey move.
|
|
Date Joined: Oct 16, 2018 11:05:52 GMT -5
|
Post by hank on Oct 31, 2023 17:07:20 GMT -5
And refer back to the title of this thread and the opening post, and you will see why there is sarcasm. I used a ? mark in the title and then shared my thoughts in the 2nd post. I haven’t seen anything to sway from my original thoughts.
|
|
Date Joined: May 20, 2022 16:28:37 GMT -5
|
Post by apple on Oct 31, 2023 17:12:00 GMT -5
ob·tuse /əbˈto͞os,äbˈto͞os/ adjective 1. annoyingly insensitive or slow to understand.
|
|
Date Joined: Mar 14, 2016 18:48:07 GMT -5
|
Post by Springschick on Oct 31, 2023 17:56:25 GMT -5
And refer back to the title of this thread and the opening post, and you will see why there is sarcasm. I used a ? mark in the title and then shared my thoughts in the 2nd post. I haven’t seen anything to sway from my original thoughts. I expect that from you.
|
|
Date Joined: Oct 16, 2018 11:05:52 GMT -5
|
Post by hank on Oct 31, 2023 19:11:52 GMT -5
I used a ? mark in the title and then shared my thoughts in the 2nd post. I haven’t seen anything to sway from my original thoughts. I expect that from you. Forgive me for having an opinion other than yours. If you notice I never said you were wrong.
|
|
Date Joined: Mar 14, 2016 18:48:07 GMT -5
|
Post by Springschick on Oct 31, 2023 19:25:00 GMT -5
Forgive me for having an opinion other than yours. If you notice I never said you were wrong. The fact that you even entertained that this was murder is just ridiculous. It has nothing to do with my opinion. You thrive on conspiracy theories. I do not.
|
|
Date Joined: Oct 16, 2018 11:05:52 GMT -5
|
Post by hank on Oct 31, 2023 20:01:20 GMT -5
Forgive me for having an opinion other than yours. If you notice I never said you were wrong. The fact that you even entertained that this was murder is just ridiculous. It has nothing to do with my opinion. You thrive on conspiracy theories. I do not. I entertain it’s manslaughter.
|
|
Date Joined: Mar 14, 2016 18:48:07 GMT -5
|
Post by Springschick on Oct 31, 2023 20:08:31 GMT -5
The fact that you even entertained that this was murder is just ridiculous. It has nothing to do with my opinion. You thrive on conspiracy theories. I do not. I entertain it’s manslaughter. Not according to the title of your thread.
|
|
Date Joined: Oct 16, 2018 11:05:52 GMT -5
|
Post by hank on Oct 31, 2023 21:32:41 GMT -5
I entertain it’s manslaughter. Not according to the title of your thread. The only one who is telling people what to believe is you. Or am I misunderstanding you?
|
|
Date Joined: Oct 26, 2021 18:21:44 GMT -5
|
Post by Rusty on Oct 31, 2023 22:15:40 GMT -5
|
|